UPDF Rejects NYT Claims of Gen. Muhoozi's Abuse, Denies Meeting Writer Kakwenza

The Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) has issued a strong denial regarding claims of abuse involving Chief of Defence Forces General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, as reported in a recent New York Times article. The army specifically rejected allegations made by exiled Ugandan writer Kakwenza Rukirabashaija, stating that the two individuals have never met.

In a statement released by Col Chris Magezi, the acting Director of Defence Public Information, the UPDF characterized the allegations cited in Megan K. Stack’s New York Times piece as “disparaging, unfounded, and utterly scandalous.” Magezi accused the Western media of political bias and of repeating opposition narratives without proper verification.

The New York Times article, titled “The Authoritarian Future Is Already Here,” published on October 8, 2026, examined concerns about authoritarianism in Uganda. It included Kakwenza’s claims that General Muhoozi visited him during his detention and subjected him to humiliating treatment, including alleged demands related to his physical appearance and an offer of money to remain silent.

The UPDF countered these assertions, with Magezi firmly stating, “General Muhoozi Kainerugaba has never met Kakwenza Rukirabashaija in his life.” Magezi also highlighted perceived inconsistencies in Kakwenza’s account as presented in the article.

Beyond refuting the specific claims concerning Kakwenza, the UPDF accused Western media organizations of a sustained campaign to discredit General Muhoozi, suggesting their reporting is influenced by preferences for future leadership in Uganda. The army cited previous articles from The Telegraph, Wall Street Journal, and The Economist as examples of what it termed hostile coverage.

Magezi emphasized that General Muhoozi is a decorated officer with extensive service and that his military career should be assessed based on facts, not sensationalized media reports or anecdotal evidence. The UPDF reiterated its commitment to upholding the law and due process for any allegations of human rights violations, stressing that Uganda’s future leadership should be decided by its citizens.

This response from the UPDF represents the official military stance on the allegations presented in the New York Times article. It is important to note that the UPDF’s statement does not provide independent evidence to corroborate its denial of the alleged encounters. The army also issued a warning against foreign interference in Uganda’s internal affairs.

Source: Nile Post