news 21 June 2026 Daily Monitor (Uganda)
State Opposes Bail for Erias Lukwago, Citing Treason Charge and Security Concerns
The State is opposing the bail application of former Kampala Lord Mayor Erias Lukwago, presenting at least seven arguments to the Makindye Chief Magistrates' Court. Key among these are the severity of the treason charge, potential interference with witnesses, and Lukwago's political influence potentially undermining national security. Source: https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/here-is-why-state-wants-lukwago-denied-bail-5503974
The State has presented a strong case against granting bail to the former Kampala Lord Mayor, Erias Lukwago, who is currently remanded on charges of misprision of treason. In its formal reply to Lukwago’s bail application, the prosecution outlined seven grounds on which the court should deny his release.
A core argument from the State focuses on the gravity of the misprision of treason charge, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The prosecution contends that the seriousness of this offense, coupled with potential security concerns, creates a high likelihood that Lukwago might abscond if released. They also argue that the nature of the crime involves knowledge of plots to overthrow the government through violence, which inherently poses a threat to national stability and security.
Regarding Lukwago’s claims of ill health, the State countered that he has not provided sufficient medical evidence to prove a recurrence of the spinal cord issues that led him to seek treatment in India. They assert that the medical facilities within the Uganda Prisons Service are capable of managing any health conditions he might present.
The prosecution also raised concerns about Lukwago’s potential to interfere with witnesses, citing his prominent position as a former Lord Mayor and current president of the People’s Front for Freedom party. They believe his political power and influence could be used to intimidate those who might testify against him.
Furthermore, the State questioned Lukwago’s fixed place of abode, noting discrepancies in the provided documentation, which they argue would make it difficult to trace him. Another point of contention was the definition of advanced age, with the State arguing that Lukwago, at 56, does not meet the legal threshold of ‘advanced age’ (defined as 60) to warrant special consideration for bail on that basis.
Concerns were also voiced about the suitability of the sureties presented by the defense, with questions raised about their relationship with Lukwago and their ability to compel his appearance in court. The court is set to hear further directions on Monday, with the prosecution expected to formally submit its response.