news 13 March 2026 The Observer (Uganda)
High Court Upholds Judges' Power to Limit Live Media Broadcasts in Courtrooms
Uganda's High Court has affirmed that judges can restrict live audio and video coverage of trials to protect fair hearings. The decision dismissed a challenge by journalist Livingstone Matovu against a magistrate's directive in a city pastor's case. Source: https://observer.ug/news/high-court-backs-restrictions-on-live-media-coverage-of-court-proceedings
Uganda’s High Court ruled that judges hold inherent powers to control media coverage during court sessions. Justice Collins Acellam stressed the need to weigh freedom of expression against fair trial rights and public interest.
The case stemmed from a judicial review by journalist Livingstone Matovu. He contested a Mengo Chief Magistrate’s order banning live recordings in a city pastor’s criminal trial and requiring media verification for courtroom access. Matovu claimed it hampered transparency and media duties.
Justice Acellam countered that open justice allows public attendance but not automatic live broadcasting rights. He cited Article 43 of the Constitution, permitting justifiable limits on rights, and Section 40(1) of the Magistrates Courts Act, empowering magistrates to regulate proceedings.
The judge clarified the order maintained public access while curbing live media to avoid risks like witness intimidation, prejudicial social media spread, and distorted online recordings. Courts in common law systems increasingly adopt such safeguards.
Finding no bias or overreach, Acellam dismissed the application, upholding the magistrate’s authority to ensure trial integrity.
Source: The Observer (Uganda)